Offensive security that thinks like
real adversaries.

Specialized VAPT for modern attack surfaces — web apps, APIs, cloud, authentication flows, and business-critical infrastructure. Manual-first testing. Real exploit paths. Actionable remediation.

MsgHub.info Nevil Network Radhika Road Lines Tirthankarr Roofing LLP Dhruvi Steel LLP TOG Architects HackerOne · vetted Bugcrowd · vetted Intigriti YesWeHack Synack MsgHub.info Nevil Network Radhika Road Lines Tirthankarr Roofing LLP Dhruvi Steel LLP TOG Architects HackerOne · vetted Bugcrowd · vetted Intigriti YesWeHack Synack
— What we do

Four ways we
show up for your team.

Pick one or stack them. Most teams start with a VAPT before a release, then graduate to continuous PTaaS or a managed bounty as they scale. DevSecOps is how we make sure the fixes stick.

auth · verified access control ! IDOR · billing ! RCE · upload retest pending
Pillar 01 · VAPT

VAPT & PTaaS

Time-boxed deep tests for web, mobile, API, network, and cloud. Manual exploitation, business-logic depth, and a written report your auditors and your engineers both accept.

Web API Mobile Cloud Internal Net Read more →
SURAPURA triage Ω λ π θ Δ
Pillar 02 · Managed

Managed Bug Bounty

Public, private, or VDP — we run scope, hunter relations, intake, deduplication, severity, payouts, and engineering handoff. Your team only sees validated, reproduced, fix-ready tickets.

Triage Dedup Payouts VDP Disclosure Read more →
scope test file SUR-218 · open continuous · always-on
Pillar 03 · Continuous

PTaaS — Pentest as a Service

Pentests that run with your release cadence, not against it. New surface? New test. Real testers, real exploitation, scoped per sprint, retests included, findings in the tracker your engineers already use.

Per-sprint Jira / Linear Retest included Audit-ready Read more →
code scan fix ship ! [pass] sast · 0 high [pass] secrets · 0 [fix] authz · 1 critical
Pillar 04 · Engineering

DevSecOps Enablement

Security where engineers actually live — code, CI/CD, cloud, container, IaC. Threat modeling, guardrails, pre-commit and pipeline checks, and post-fix validation. We slow nothing, we surface what matters.

CI/CD SAST Cloud Threat Model IaC Read more →
85% Findings rated High or Critical by client risk team
< 24h Triage SLA on managed bounty programs
2x Free retests included with every VAPT engagement
0 Padded "informational" filler in our reports
— How we work

A sequence,
not a sales deck.

Every engagement runs the same shape — whether it's a one-time VAPT or a year-long managed program. Scope. Test. Prove. Verify. No theatre, no orphan tickets.

01

Scope & recon

We map your real attack surface — not just what you remember owning. Subdomains, APIs, mobile builds, cloud accounts, dependencies, third parties. Then we agree the rules of engagement in writing.

deliverable · scope doc + asset inventory
02

Test & exploit

Humans, not just scanners. We chase business-logic flaws, auth bypasses, IDORs, broken access control, payment manipulation — the bugs that hurt. Findings come with working PoCs.

deliverable · live findings + PoC steps
03

Triage & report

Each finding gets reproduced, severity-scored (CVSS + business context), assigned to a fix owner, and dropped into your tracker — Jira, Linear, GitHub. Plus an exec summary the board can read.

deliverable · tracker tickets + exec summary
04

Verify the fix

Patches get re-tested manually. We try to bypass them. If the fix holds, we sign it off and close the loop. If not, we tell you why and how to do it right. Every engagement closes with a clean retest.

deliverable · retest report + sign-off
— What we actually find

Bugs that
hit the P&L,
not just the
scanner output.

We don't pad reports with missing-header noise. The vulnerabilities below are the ones that put your customers, revenue, and contracts at risk — and they're the ones we hunt.

Their team found a privilege escalation chain in two days that our pentester last quarter, our SAST scanner, and our previous bounty program all missed. The retest was equally thorough. — Head of Engineering, fintech client (under NDA)

Payment & pricing manipulation

Coupon stacking, price-tampering, refund abuse, currency rounding bugs — bypass logic that costs revenue per attempt.

CRIT

Account takeover & auth bypass

Broken OAuth flows, JWT mishandling, password reset poisoning, MFA bypass — direct routes into customer accounts.

CRIT

IDOR & broken access control

Cross-tenant data access, horizontal privilege escalation, hidden admin endpoints — quiet bugs with loud breach reports.

HIGH

SSRF & cloud metadata theft

Server-side requests reaching internal services, IMDS exposure, lateral cloud movement — the kind of bug that doesn't make it to the news, only to court.

CRIT

Business-logic abuse

Race conditions on transactions, workflow bypasses, quota tampering — flaws no scanner can catch because they live in your unique rules.

BIZ-LOGIC

Supply-chain & integration risk

Backdoored dependencies, unsafe SDK behavior, third-party webhook abuse — the trust boundary you forgot to test.

HIGH
— Why teams pick us

More signal.
Zero noise.

We treat security work like an engineering deliverable, not a compliance checkbox. Every finding is reproduced, every fix is verified, every report is something a developer can act on without translating.

handled by humans · not just scanners
01

Exploit-grade triage

Every finding shipped to your tracker carries a working PoC, request/response samples, and a direct fix owner. If we can't reproduce it, we don't file it.

02

Curated researcher pool

For managed programs, we activate vetted hunters with HackerOne / Bugcrowd / Synack track records — not anonymous floods chasing scanner output.

03

Business-logic specialists

We hunt the bugs that automation can't see — pricing manipulation, auth chain abuses, multi-step workflow bypasses, race conditions on revenue paths.

04

Workflow-native delivery

Findings land in Jira, Linear, or GitHub Issues with full repro, severity, and remediation context. Your engineers don't open a PDF — they open a ticket.

05

Audit-ready by default

Every engagement is mapped to SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI-DSS, and DORA controls. The report your CISO sends to auditors and the one your devs read are the same report.

06

Closed-loop retesting

Patches get manually verified — we try to bypass them. Every engagement ends with a written retest sign-off. No "we'll trust the dev" handwaving.

— How we operate

Principles
over processes.

We've worked enough enterprise security theatre to know what's real and what's noise. These are the rules we run by — we'd rather lose a deal than break them.

01

If it can't be reproduced, it isn't a finding

No "potential issues," no "could possibly lead to," no theory papers. Every finding ships with a working request, a working response, and a working steps-to-reproduce.

02

Engineers are the audience

Reports are written so the developer who'll fix the bug doesn't need a security analyst to translate them. Plain language, real impact, concrete fix.

03

The fix is part of the engagement

We don't drop a 200-page PDF and disappear. We retest patches, debate fix strategies on calls, and stay until the loop closes. You get a partner, not a vendor.

04

No padding, ever

"Server header disclosed" is not a finding. "Cookie missing HttpOnly on a static page" is not a finding. We surface what matters; the rest goes in an appendix you can ignore.

05

You own the data, always

Reports, evidence, scoping artifacts, vulnerability ledger — all yours, in your account, exportable in standard formats. No platform lock-in. No vendor leverage.

— Get started

Bring us your
riskiest thing.

30-minute briefing, no obligation. Tell us what you're worried about — pre-launch app, audit deadline, noisy bounty program, sprawling cloud estate — and we'll tell you exactly what we'd test, how, and what the report looks like.

What you walk away with
  • A focused scope you can actually run — not a 12-page proposal
  • A sample report from a similar engagement (sanitized)
  • A clear timeline, fixed price, retest included
  • An honest read on whether we're the right team